![]() Because of this, I found the listening exercises quite useless, and you will simply not learn to speak or listen to the language correctly.Īs stated above, Duolingo does not offer any explanation of grammatical structures as part of its mobile platform. The voice is dry, non-rhythmical, and well, it sounds like a computer. Rather, you’ll only be exposed to short phrases/sentences.ĭuolingo uses a computerized voice system for all of its listening exercises, so you’re not introduced to how the language really sounds. Probably not the best arsenal of sentences to impress the native speakers on your next trip overseas…ĭuolingo has no natural sounding conversations, the stuff you would normally find in most good textbooks. For example, I’ve come across such sentences as: “My snake eats your cake,” “I have our cow,” “Their elephant drinks milk,” “The knife is in the boot,” “We come from the women,” and many more similar ones. I don’t know how often you use the words “elephant”, “lion”, “snake”, or “horse” in your daily conversations with people, but no matter how useless you think this vocabulary is, you’ll have to go through the lessons that introduce it whether you like it or not.Īs stated above, because the program progresses in set stages and introduces vocabulary in what I call “boxes” (animals, food, jobs, furniture, etc.) rather than in a more natural fashion, the sentences you are exposed to, in a large number of early lessons, are essentially useless and at times nonsensical. In this respect, Duolingo is in dramatic opposition to other language methods such as Assimil, Teach Yourself, or Berlitz. You are not exposed to natural sounding conversations and sentences (at least, not until very much later as you reach more advanced lessons). This is basically a summary of what this website has to say.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |